• Home
  • 台灣登山地圖
  • 關於我
    • 關於我
    • 免責聲明
  • 聯繫方式
  • 語言選單:  中文 (台灣)
    • English  English
    • 中文 (台灣)  中文 (台灣)
Menu
  • Home
  • 台灣登山地圖
  • 關於我
    • 關於我
    • 免責聲明
  • 聯繫方式
  • 語言選單:  中文 (台灣)
    • English  English
    • 中文 (台灣)  中文 (台灣)
Home  /  Equipment • Field Recording • General • 野外錄音  /  KLX250S Stock Exhaust vs FMF Q4
12 8月 2015

KLX250S Stock Exhaust vs FMF Q4

Written by Glenn
Equipment, Field Recording, General, 野外錄音 Exhaust, FMF Q4, klxs250s, Sound Test 1 Comment

Sorry, this entry is only available in English

It came time for me to pick up a new slip-on exhaust for my bike. I wanted the weight savings of an aftermarket exhaust as well as the power increase. What I didn’t want was a headache and pissed off looks from people as I drove by. I wanted something quiet. I wanted to have my cake and to eat it too. After some diligent searching, the best option within my price range was the  [content_tooltip id=”1516″] But there was a problem…

Sound is Subjective

One guy reports it being real quiet. Another guy says it’s way too loud for him. So I quickly searched youtube for answers. And man, there are a bunch of videos for the Q4! A lot for the KLX as well. Ain’t the Internet a grand thing?! Well…not exactly.

The next problem is, you can’t really tell from the videos. Sound quality is all over the place. Well, not exactly. The sound quality sucks. And why shouldn’t it suck? They’re recorded with phones that use limited microphones. Bass is is majorly lacking. And some sound like there’s a low pass filter chopping off the higher frequencies.

With little to go on, I bought the Q4 *hoping* it wouldn’t be too loud for my liking. In event is was, my “Plan B” was to buy the Powercore 4 Quiet Core Insert that has been reported to fit with some small modifications and helps reduce the noise – AND…with no reported power loss. Nice!

With all that in mind, I went on a little nerdy crusade to make a video on the sound difference between my stock KLX250s muffler and my new FMF Q4. I figured what the hell. I have the audio  equipment, I’ve been dabbling in video lately. Why not give it a shot? Now the next guy thinking to buy a Q4 can have something solid to make his decision on. Or so I hope.

Location

I was looking for a quiet place to record. It wasn’t easy. I’ve come to realize that there are no quiet places in Taiwan during daylight hours…only less noisy places. I decided on an industrial park in Pingdong county that’s “less than used”. It has lots of open spaces and not so much vehicle traffic. There’s a parking lot for nobody that looked great for the test. (literally no buildings around and no practical reason to park there)

2015-07-30-18.31_web

I packed up all my gear and made the drive out…

2015-07-30-14.36_web

Set everything up…

2015-07-30-18.03_web

…and began recording.

IMG_9424_adj

I later realized it would take about 24 hours for the high temp silicone to properly cure. So I brought the Q4 for nothing.

The Video

I wanted the video to be more than just “walking around the bike and giving it a few revs”. I wanted to see just how many decibels each exhaust was spitting out. I wanted to hear how it sounded as it drove by. I wanted to know how it sounded while you were driving. And that’s exactly what I did.

There are three parts to the comparison:

  • SAE J2825 specs to measure their loudness (Camera on the tach, sound meter, and overall scene)
  • Slow & Fast drive-by’s
  • Driver’s perspective

It didn’t turn out perfect–there was a glare obscuring part of the tach in the stock exhaust scene–but I think it gets the job done. I’m pleased with the audio. I made note of all the preamps’ volume levels, placed the mics in exactly the same spots, and level matched everything in post. I further double checked the statistics in each of the individual parts of the loudness test to see if they corresponded to the differences in the sound level meter’s readings. And they did. (i.e. Sound meter showed 12db difference at 5000RPM and the recordings showed a 12db difference as well)

Equipment

Recorder:

Tascam DR-680

Mics:

  • Shure KSM141 Omni Pattern (Decibel Comparison)
  • Line Audio CM3 – Stereo (Drive-by)
  • Soundfield SPS200 – (Rider’s Perspective)

Sound Level Meter:

  • Tenmars TM-102 (AKA: Bikemaster Auto-ranging Sound meter)

Cameras:

  • Canon PowerShot SX230 HS (Loudness Test, Drive-by)
  • Contour Roam2 (Sound Meter, Rider’s Perspective)
  • iPhone5 (Tach)

Bike Setup

  • 2014 KLX250S EFI
  • Stock Header Pipe
  • KDX200 Snorkel
  • O2 Sensor Eliminator
  • Iridium Spark Plug

    (The rest is stock)

 

The Results

As expected, the Q4 has a lot more “bark” and plenty of bass. When you first listen you might think something is screwed up. I sure did. The Q4 sounds WAAAAAAY louder. I double checked everything…twice. And it all adds up. The Q4 is roughly 10dBA or so louder than stock. Though at higher RPM’s they’re closer (6dba difference at 8000RPM)

Here are the rough numbers:

 StockQ4Difference
Idle65dBA74dBA+9
2000rpm71dBA83dBA+12
5000rpm81dBA93dBA+12
8000rpm90.5dBA96.5dBA+6

Something very important to keep in mind is how the decibel scale works. It’s not a linear scale like a ruler, it’s a logarithmic scale. So saying something is 10dB higher is saying it has 10 times the sound intensity (power). But as far as perceived loudness goes, it’s roughly twice as loud. So you could say that the FMF Q4 is roughly twice as loud as the stock KLX250s exhaust. Also keep in mind that these were measured 50 centimeters away from the exhaust.

You can test this for yourself if you have audio software that can give you statistics of the selected audio. Simply double the audio track of the stock exhaust, save it to a new file and compare it to the Q4. The decibels will be darn near the same.

Here’s a copy of the original audio in case youtube has done something to it: KLX250s Stock Exhaust vs Q4 Original Audio

 Final Thoughts

This “test” was just for fun. This wasn’t meant to be scientific, and shouldn’t be taken as such. There are just too many variables to be controlled for me to make this anything beyond a fun reference. Audio recording is my job and hobby. So I enjoy the steps involved in putting something like this together. If you have any comments, please feel free to post in the comments section.

 

Share On
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Pinterest
Share on Reddit
 Previous Article Maolin – Wánggōng Shān (王公山)
Next Article   颱風蘇迪勒 – 錄音嘗試

1 Comment

  1. 自動引用通知: KLX250S Stock Exhaust vs Q4 Video (with sound level meter) - Kawasaki Forums

發佈留言 取消回覆

Hiking in Taiwan & Offroad Motorcycling

近期留言

  • 「Glenn」於〈台灣高鐵錄音之旅:高速列車捕捉與車站環境音〉發佈留言
  • 「Zhen zhen」於〈台灣高鐵錄音之旅:高速列車捕捉與車站環境音〉發佈留言
  • 「Glenn」於〈(English) Importing a Satellite Phone into Taiwan〉發佈留言
  • 「Mark」於〈(English) Importing a Satellite Phone into Taiwan〉發佈留言
  • 「Glenn」於〈坪埔厝山、草山、南湖呂山西健行〉發佈留言
TAIWAN RELATED OUTDOORS BLOGS & SIMILAR TOPICS

分類

PRIVACY POLICY

Tip Jar / 小費罐

Find something useful? Click the jar to buy me a coffee or send a little more to help with my hosting costs, or heck, why not a shit ton of cash to buy me a new motorcycle!? But really, any amount is GREATLY appreciated!

覺得內容有用嗎?點擊罐子請我喝杯咖啡,或多給一點幫我支付主機費用,或者,幹嘛不來一大筆現金讓我買台新摩托車!?……選擇在你。但說真的,任何金額我都超感謝!

Copyright © 2023 by outrecording.com. All Rights Reserved. Please read this Disclaimer / Privacy Policy before using any information on this site.

  [Valid RSS]